Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

epa04286154 Attorney Carmine Boccuzzi (R), representing Argentina, leaves Federal Court in New York, New York, USA, 27 June 2014. He was attending a hearing regarding Argentina's petition to postpone deadlines to repay a 1.65 billion US dollar debt to US hedge funds. Argentina on 26 June deposited 1 billion dollars in Buenos Aires banks to cover interest payment on restructured bonds due on 30 June. The move was an attempt to show the country is meeting its obligations to pay interest on restructured loans held by its current bond holders. A total of 832 million US dollars was deposited at the central bank of Argentina into the account of Bank of New York Mellon among others. However, this move conflicts with a court order that prohibits Argentina from making the payments without also servicing defaulted debt held by a group of hold-out hedge funds. EPA/Andrew Gombert ORG XMIT: agx1 / Andrew Gombert EPA

NEW YORK (AP) - Time to resolve Argentina's long battle with creditors is running out.

Argentina owes an interest payment to the majority of its creditors on Monday, though the government has a 30-day grace period after that to avoid going into another catastrophic default.

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Argentina, letting stand a lower court ruling that it must pay off hedge funds that own bonds left over from the country's default in 2001. President Cristina Fernandez has said Argentina couldn't afford to pay them while also making regular interest payments to other lenders.

On Friday, a federal judge pleaded with Argentina to continue negotiating with the hedge funds. At the same time, the judge called Argentina's attempt to make its regular interest payment illegal.

One misstep and Argentina could slide into another default, 13 years after a record $100 billion default devastated its economy.

Just how did Argentina wind up in this mess? And why is a U.S. court telling another country what to do? Here are some questions and answers:

Q: What happened after the Supreme Court turned Argentina down?

A: A lot. The Supreme Court also decided to let bondholders subpoena banks in U.S. courts to track down Argentina's assets abroad. The decisions drove the country's Merval stock index down 11%.

The next day, the rating agency Standard & Poor's cut Argentina's rating further into junk territory - to CCC-, S&P's lowest grade for any country.

For most countries, the rating agency's move would be a harsh blow, pushing up borrowing costs and making it harder to finance government budgets. But Argentina's troubles are so well-known that the downgrade came as little surprise. Argentina hasn't borrowed from the bond markets since its default in 2001.

Q: Who are the players?

A: In one corner, Argentina's government. In the other, a group of investors led by NML Capital, a subsidiary of Elliot Capital Management, run by billionaire Paul Singer. Singer, a lawyer by training, has in the past successfully sued the governments of Peru and the Republic of the Congo to make good on their bonds. In this case, NML and other funds bought bonds left from Argentina's default in 2001.

Q: What do they want?

A: When the hedge funds bought the defaulted bonds, they joined the ranks of Argentina's creditors. Now, like lenders everywhere, they want the borrower to repay its debts on the original terms.

The problem is, other creditors had already agreed to cut Argentina a break in 2005 and 2010 by swapping their bonds for new ones worth much less. Investors traded in roughly 93% of the defaulted bonds altogether, and this helped Argentina's government slash its debts.

The bonds acquired by Singer's group were among those left over. In 2012, U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa in New York ordered Argentina to pay the holdouts. They're now owed $1.5 billion in principal and interest.

Q: Why is a U.S. court telling a foreign government what to do?

A: When a big business goes bust, it winds up in bankruptcy court. By contrast, sovereign countries have no dedicated international court to help them strike deals with creditors. So in agreements involving bond sales, language typically stipulates that any legal battle must occur in one of the two biggest financial capitals: New York or London. "That's where the money is," said Anna Gelpern, a professor of international law at Georgetown University and an expert on government debt.

Q: Why does this matter?

A: One worry is that forcing Argentina to pay the holdouts would set a dangerous precedent. The thinking is that it could encourage bondholders to play tough when governments try to restructure their debts. After the Supreme Court's decision, the International Monetary Fund warned that it could have far-reaching repercussions. "We are concerned about possible broader systemic implications," the IMF said.

Another concern is that the ruling upends the usual order of things. In the past, when some creditors had to take precedence over others, sovereign governments typically came before investment funds, said Mark Blyth, a professor of international political economy at Brown University.

"The old hierarchy really no longer applies," he said.

In negotiating with lenders, governments had the threat of default on their side. Creditors accepted restructuring deals in the certainty that they would at least receive something. Now, it seems, "the courts are taking away the possibility of default," Blyth said. "It's part of this wider push to put investors ahead of everyone else."

Q: How big is Argentina's economy?

A: It's South America's second-largest behind Brazil, according to the IMF. The IMF puts the country's economic output for this year at $404 billion, or $9,639 a person. By contrast, the United States has a $17 trillion economy, or $55,000 a person, according to the IMF's data.

Q: Argentina isn't poor. Why doesn't the government just pay off the holdouts and be finished with them?

A: It's not that simple. Argentina is supposed to make an interest payment to bondholders June 30, and the judge's verdict requires it to pay the holdouts their $1.5 billion at the same time. If that were the entire bill, it wouldn't be a problem.

"$1.5 billion isn't going to break Argentina," said Siobhan Morden, head of Latin American strategy at the investment bank Jefferies. "The problem is all the other litigants that could join in."

Paying the hedge funds in full would likely trigger lawsuits from other bondholders, demanding to be paid on similar terms. Buenos Aires estimates that the liability could run up to $15 billion. Morden said it could approach $20 billion.

With nearly $29 billion in foreign reserves, Argentina appears to have the money to pay its bills. But those reserves include loans to other countries, deposits with the IMF and other assets that aren't easily used. Take those away, and Argentina has roughly $16 billion on hand.

Struggling countries often find bond investors willing to lend to them to pay other creditors. But Argentina has been locked out of the bond markets for more than a decade. Some investors would probably step up to lend it money - at painfully high interest rates.

"You can see why they have some financial reservations about paying the holdouts," Morden said.

Q: How are traders treating Argentina?

A: They're keeping a safe distance. Judging by recent trading, bond buyers seem to think another default is imminent. In the market for credit default swaps, Argentina's government debt is among the most expensive to insure in the world.

To insure $10 million in Argentine bonds for five years, investors must pay around $4 million up front, then an additional $500,000 a year, according to Markit, a data provider. That implies odds of three chances out of four that Argentina will default within five years.

Taking out insurance on debt from Brazil looks cheap in comparison. The cost to insure Brazil's debt runs $139,000 for five years, and investors have to pay nothing up front.

Q: So if Argentina defaulted on its debts again, would it spread turmoil to other countries?

A: Not immediately. Argentina is already isolated from global credit markets, the usual route for financial turmoil to spread, because traders have been wary of just such a threat.

Over the long term, however, a default could still cause problems for other countries. Gelpern said her concern is that Argentina's experience will make it harder for smaller countries to find a way out of their troubles. "Other weaker countries can't afford to wage fights for 13 years," she said.



Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read the original story: Argentina's debt fight: Why it matters

More In

test

Real Deals

Flip, shop and save on specials from your favorite retailers in central Ohio.

GET DEALS | COUPONS

Things To Do

SAT
20
SUN
21
MON
22
TUE
23
WED
24
THU
25
FRI
26

CLASSIFIEDS

Classifieds from across Central Ohio
Lancaster
Chillicothe
Newark
Marion
Bucyrus
Mansfield
Zanesville
Coshocton

Weeklies & Shoppers

10TV Headlines

Dispatch Headlines

METROMIX